Follow-up depended on available time.
- Manual callbacks competed with the rest of the day.
- Customers could leave with a price or coverage question unanswered.
- Renewals required another round of follow-up.
Sales persuasion, from the first signal to the next sale.

A sales journey for the decisions your customers make.
Customer story · Insurance
In a controlled A/B test over 90 days, the team using Sellence achieved 3x sales per agent.
Updated

The Full Story
At Libra, the work continued after a customer received a quote. People compared prices, put off a decision or needed another conversation before renewing. Following through depended on the team finding time to return to each customer.
Libra tested a different approach. A control team continued with its existing process, while another team used Sellence for personal text conversations. The model handled follow-up and qualification, including the questions that came back when a customer was still considering their renewal.
The conversation could continue beyond the first reply. A customer comparing prices could explain what mattered to them, receive a relevant answer and return to the decision without starting again. Over the 90-day controlled test, Libra reported 3x sales per agent for the team using Sellence, with the same headcount.
Before and After
Inside the Conversation
The customer is comparing prices. The next message explains the excess tradeoff, then brings the decision back to the cover they need.
Illustrative conversation. Names and details are examples, not a customer transcript.
Hi, it’s Maya from Libra. Your renewal is coming up. Anything you’d like to check before you decide?
i've found a cheaper quote
Is the excess the same on both quotes?
no, it's higher on the cheaper one
That means paying more yourself if you claim. Want to review your current renewal before deciding?
yes, send me the link
Here’s your renewal to review. Compare the cover and excess, and we can continue with any questions here.Review your renewal
The Results
Sales per agent
Days in the controlled A/B test.
Team headcount.
Relative performance. Baseline = 1×.
Controlled A/B test over 90 days.
Libra’s team using Sellence achieved 3x sales per agent over 90 days, with the same headcount.

“Within 3 months, the Sellence team had tripled their performance.”
Questions About This Story
Libra compared a team using its existing process with a team using Sellence in a controlled A/B test over 90 days.
Personal follow-up, qualification and renewal conversations. The example above shows how a price objection can become a more useful comparison.
No. Libra reported the result with the same headcount. The measured result is sales per agent, rather than the total number of messages sent.
Start with One Sales Journey
Bring a renewal flow and the questions customers ask before deciding. We’ll walk through the conversation.
Book a Demo